First, following Cuomo's role model, Spitzer, and Spitzer's money trail (Or How the People of NY lost big):
If  you believe Eliot Spitzer resigned only because of a whore, please  contact me for a three life or 99 year lease on a bridge.  Spitzer  funded his Governor's  campaign with a shakedown that damaged NY  finances.   Here's a quote from Great Britain on the election of Eliot  Spitzer:
"Barring the most astonishing electoral upset in history, Eliot  Spitzer will, by the time you read this, be  governor-elect of New York.   History will  come to view him as one of the most damaging figures in  the history of  the state.  It  is difficult to imagine that he will, as  governor, do anything to  counter the damage he has already done to  American business, or even  that he would wish to do so.  As governor, he  will probably continue to  make things much worse."
Read the whole article at   http://www.quentinlangley.net/article.php?ex=-1&id=290
Was  Spitzer worth his cost to the People of NY?   Should Spitzer have  become our first Jewish President?
NYT's Wake Up Call:   Did Clinton resign because of Monica?  Did Spitzer resign because his  moral standing was eroded?   Did Spitzer have a moral standard?   Did  Spitzer resign, because there was a more to hide, and he got a deal, he  couldn't refuse from federal prosecutors?    If federal prosecutors  offered a deal, do the People have to accept it, also?
    Second, following  Cuomo's money trail:
Is Cuomo like Spitzer, a  Gollum, obsessed with the  "Ring," and becoming Governor and our first Italian president?   Do the People of NY benefit when Cuomo shakes down lawyers for his campaign  treasury, instead of Spitzer shaking down Wall Street?   Cuomo built a  16 million dollar campaign fund  with payoffs by lawyers with cases  against NY State.     In the end don't the payoffs made to Cuomo's treasury come at the expense of the People of NY whose interests were compromised?   Was the salary paid by the People of NY  insufficient for Cuomo' needs?
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=a0OvxJSr7EbU
Matthew 6:24 "No man can serve two masters" nor can the People's attorney.
 Here is the applicable Disciplinary Rule copied from the NY State's Codes, Rules and Regulations:
DR 5-101 [1200.20]  Conflicts of Interest - Lawyer's  Own Interests.   A lawyer shall not  accept    or  continue employment if the exercise of professional  judgment on  behalf     of the client will be or reasonably may be affected by the lawyer’s   own financial,    business, property, or personal interests, unless a disinterested  lawyer would     believe that the representation of the client will not be adversely   affected    thereby and the client consents to the representation after  full  disclosure    of the implications of the lawyer’s interest.
Questions in regard the blue text above for Andrew Cuomo:
1. Did you obtain the consent of  the People after full  disclosure of  the implications  before you took the money for your own personal campaign interests?   Answer -NO.
2. A special prosecutor?
3. Is your defense, Spitzer did it first?
