The NY Times attacks the Pope with "Any role the current pope may have played in responding to those allegations over the years is a significant aspect of this story," but ignores the corruption here in NY's Courts and Government. In NY, the NY Times needn't qualify corruption with "may have." Plus, the NY Times knows when AG Cuomo knew.
New York's unresolved budget crisis has Senators Sampson and Klein as Senate Leaders negotiating the budget, who have committed publicly reported acts which will harm NY Taxpayers. The NY Times said regarding the Pope, its reports were "based on meticulous reporting and documents." The NY Times needn't waste its money for "meticulous reporting" in regard to either reporting and/or asking AG Cuomo to prosecute, because the documents and criminal charges are already in public domain.
Perhaps, if the NY Times doesn't support prosecution, the NY Times will support transparency in NY Government and can ask Senators Sampson and Klein to open up the bidding to influence their votes to a free market, where all NY citizens could openly bid for their votes and influence.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
New comments are not allowed.